The Lab Leak Was Just the Beginning
How Fauci’s Emails, Royalties, and Media Control Engineered a Pandemic of Silence
"Science will win." But what if the science was owned, the dissent was silenced, and the game was rigged?
The Setup: Fauci's Role Before the Pandemic
Between 2014 and 2019, Dr. Anthony Fauci’s NIAID awarded millions in grants to EcoHealth Alliance, an NGO led by Peter Daszak. These funds were used for gain-of-function (GOF) experiments on bat coronaviruses—including work at the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).
At least one 2018 State Department cable had already flagged safety concerns at the WIV.
So when COVID broke in late 2019… Fauci knew exactly what was at stake.
II. The Timeline of Deception
A year-by-year breakdown of what Fauci knew—and when he helped steer the narrative.
JAN–FEB 2020: Early Alarm, Rapid Cover
Jan 31: Fauci receives urgent email re: possible lab origin of SARS-CoV-2
→ He was warned.Feb 1: Secret call with Jeremy Farrar (Wellcome), Kristian Andersen, and others
→ Original lab-origin concerns were walked back within hours.Feb 5–8: Internal NIH emails reveal intent to suppress lab-leak debate
→ Collins: “a swift and devastating takedown” of opposing views.
SPRING 2020: Narrative Cemented
April: Peter Daszak thanks Fauci for publicly dismissing the lab-leak theory
→ Coordinated messaging confirmed.May–July: NIH downplays early treatments and natural immunity
→ Pharma-centric strategies dominate.
2021: Profits and Power
February: Moderna finalizes royalty agreement—NIH claims co-inventorship
→ NIH receives $400M+ in licensing revenue.Summer: Fauci publicly denies conflict of interest
→ Despite NIH patents being used in mRNA platforms he promoted.
2023–2024: FOIA Revelations
Morens Emails Released: Fauci aide admits to using Gmail to avoid FOIA, deleting records
→ “I always try to communicate via Gmail because my NIH email is FOIA’d…”Further disclosures: NIH failed to maintain required records
→ Raises potential Federal Records Act violations.
III. Three Pillars of Complicity
1. He Funded the Risk
GOF grants to EcoHealth tied directly to Wuhan research
NIH co-owned mRNA patents used in Moderna’s vaccine
Royalty recipients at NIH remain undisclosed to this day
2. He Controlled the Narrative
Emails show suppression of the lab-leak theory
Fauci & Collins called for "devastating takedown" of dissent
Social media flagged dissenting scientists—was it coordinated?
3. He Benefited From the Outcome
NIH enriched from vaccine patents
Moderna pays NIH nearly half a billion
Fauci’s net worth nearly doubled during the pandemic
IV. What They Don’t Want You to Ask
Why is the NIH still hiding the names of royalty recipients?
Why did Chinese vaccine firms pay royalties to NIH?
Why was Fauci’s team allowed to delete federal records without consequence?
Why did early lab-leak warnings get buried under public messaging?
V. Human Consequences
Scientists like Bhattacharya and Kulldorff were censored.
People lost jobs for refusing a shot built on patented tech their own government profited from.
Investigations were stalled. Lives were lost.
And whistleblowers were silenced while the media… applauded.
VI. What Comes Next
This isn’t about partisanship. It’s about accountability.
We're now preparing:
FOIA requests for individual royalty disclosures
Complaints to the NIH OIG and HHS Ethics
A timeline infographic for media, courts, and whistleblowers
A potential amicus brief in Missouri v. Biden
But here’s the real question:
Why is Palantir suddenly everywhere?
Palantir was awarded massive contracts to manage HHS Protect, the COVID-19 data clearinghouse.
They’re now expanding into military AI, immigration tracking, predictive policing, and public health infrastructure.
Quietly, they are becoming the data spine of government decisions—from emergency declarations to digital ID proposals.
If Phase 1 was panic… Phase 2 is pattern recognition.
People are waking up.
Not just because of politics, but because they’ve seen:
Tech platforms censor scientists.
Legacy institutions enrich themselves.
Experts double back on their own “truths.”
And now the data weaponry that justified lockdowns is being normalized for other crises — climate, crime, biosecurity.
If you’ve lost someone...
If your name was flagged, shadowbanned, or silenced...
If you were told to “trust the experts” while they collected royalties...
Then this moment is your leverage.
We don’t need more permission. We need more proof, more platforms, and more public memory.
📬 Follow for future releases: